LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

RAM NARAYAN GUPTA vs STATE OF M.P on 18 January, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-000520-000520 - 2008Official PDFBench Ashok Bhan, Aftab AlamAdvocates RAJESH | B. S. BANTHIA
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 520 of 2008
PETITIONER:
Ram Narayan Gupta
RESPONDENT:
State of M.P.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/01/2008
BENCH:
ASHOK BHAN & AFTAB ALAM
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT

O R D E R

CIVIL APPEAL NO.520 OF 2008 [Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.18158 of 2005]

Leave granted.

This appeal has been filed by the claimant-landholder.

Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.3000/- per bigha. In addition, solatium @ 10% and interest @ 6% p.a. was also awarded by the LAO. On reference, the Reference Court determined the potential value of the land at the rate of Rs.1/- per sq.ft. and accordingly determined the value of the land at Rs.85,500/- . Out of the said amount, 40% of the amount, viz., Rs.34200/- was deducted towards development charges. Thus, an amount of Rs.51,300/- came to be awarded as compensation. However, the Reference Court, instead of granting solatium at the rate of 30% and statutory interest, maintained the solatium and interest granted by the LAO.

Appellant-claimant filed an appeal before the High Court in which he did not challe nge the amount of compensation awarded. Only challenge was for enhancement of solatium and

C.A.No.520/08 .... (Contd.) interest. Appellant claimed solatium at the rate of 30% and interest at the rate of 15% p.a. The High Court partly allowed the appeal and increased the solatium @ 30% but maintained the interest @ 6% p.a.

Claimant, being aggrieved, has filed this appeal for enhancement of interest.

Counsel for the appellant submitted that the courts have erred in granting interest at the rate of 6% p.a. There is no reason for not awarding interest at the rate provided under

the Statute. That there was no discretion with the court to award interest at a rate lower than what was provided under the Statute.

We agree with the contention raised by the counsel for the appellant and accordingly , modify the judgment of the High Court and direct that the appellant be paid statutory interest at the rate of 9% p.a. for the first year and thereafter at the rate of 15% p.a.

The appeal is allowed accordingly.