LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

VINOD BIHARILAL NARANG vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 31 March, 2008

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-002399-002399 - 2008Official PDFAdvocates CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI | KULDIP SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2399 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP(C) No.19000/2006]
VINOD BIHARILAL NARANG ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties we are of the opinion that

the writ appeal filed by the respondents before the High Court should not have been

entertained, the writ petition having been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The impugned judgment being wholly without jurisdiction is a nullity and it

is set aside accordingly. The matter is remitted to the learned Single Judge of the High

Court for consideration thereof afresh. All contentions of the parties shall, however,

remain open before the Single Judge. The learned Single Judge is requested to

consider the desirability of expediting the hearing of the writ petition.

The appeal is disposed of with the aforementioned direction.

(S.B. SINHA)