LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

K.M. PRASHURAMA NAIKA vs BASURAPPA on 1 May, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-005147-005147 - 2002Official PDFBench Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh BediAdvocates LALITA KAUSHIK | SUCHITRA ROY SAHA
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 5147 of 2002
PETITIONER:
K.M. PRASHURAMA NAIKA
RESPONDENT:
BASURAPPA & ORS
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/05/2008
BENCH:
TARUN CHATTERJEE & HARJIT SINGH BEDI
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT

O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.5147 OF 2002

After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and going through the impugned judgm ent and other materials on record, we do not find any ground to interfere with the concurrent fi nding of facts of the courts below. In our view, this case is clearly hit by the provisions of Se ction 4 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of certain land s) Act, 1978. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.