LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

BALWINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB on 13 June, 2008

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000829-000829 - 2002Official PDFAdvocates DINESH KUMAR GARG | KULDIP SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 829 OF 2002
BALWINDER SINGH & ANR.APPELLANTS
vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.RESPONDENTS
O R D E R

Heard.

By dated 22nd August, 2001, a learned Single Judge of Punjab and

Haryana High Court cancelled the bail granted to the appellant by another

learned Single Judge of the High Court. The protection in terms of Sec. 438

Cr.P.C. was in terms of order dated 30.3.2000 of learned Single Judge.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties. As has been held by

this Court in Adri Dharan Das vs. State of West Bengal [ 2005(4) SCC p.303],

grant of protection under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. is not for an indefinite period. Within

the time to be stipulated in the order prayer for regular bail has to be made and

considered on merit. Therefore, we direct that the order dated 30.3.2000, as was

originally passed by a learned Single Judge, shall be operative for a period of six

weeks within which period the appellant shall seek regular bail in terms of what

has been stated in aforesaid decision of this Court.

The Criminal Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

JUNE 13,2008.