LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

HAMZA AJAMPULAN @ A. BEERANKUTTY vs EDATHODI ABDUL NAZER on 28 July, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-004746-004746 - 2008Official PDFBench Satyabrata Sinha, Cyriac JosephAdvocates K. RAJEEV | DEBASIS MISRA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4746 OF 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.9519/2006)
HAMZA ADAMPULAN @ A. BEERANKUTTY ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
EDATHODI ABDUL NAZER ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the

duty cast on the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to arrive at an amount providing

'just compensation' to the claimant and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this

case, we are of the opinion that an opportunity should be given to the appellant to

adduce additional evidence which has been produced before us. It furthermore

appears that the learned Tribunal and consequently the High Court had not adverted

to the question as to how much amount the appellant used to remit to his family

members from Kuwait.

We, therefore, set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court as also the

award of the Tribunal and remit the matter to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Manjeri, for the purpose of determining the amount of additional compensation to

which they may be found entitled to.

The parties shall be entitled to adduce additional evidence.

It would be open to the appellant to file appropriate application before the

Tribunal for early hearing of the matter, which may be considered on its merits.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

(S.B. SINHA)