LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

KUNAL PANKAJ KUMAR SHAH vs JUSTICE R.J.SHAH(RETD) ADMN.COMMIT on 28 July, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-004713-004713 - 2008Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates LAWYER S KNIT & CO | SHIVAJI M. JADHAV
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4713 OF 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.11158 of 2007)
Kunal Pankaj Kumar Shah ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Justice R.J. Shah (Retd.)
Admission Committee and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Leave granted.

By the impugned order, the High Court dismissed the Letters Patent

Appeal against the order passed by the learned Single Judge whereby Special Civil

Application filed by the appellant for issue of a direction to the respondents to admit

him in first year of M.B.B.S. course in Surat Municipal Institute of Medical

Education and Research, Umarwada, Surat, within the State of Gujarat, (Respondent

No.2 herein) against N.R.I. quota was dismissed.

It is borne out from the record that while issuing notice of the Special Civil

Application, the learned Single Judge passed an order for provisional admission of

the appellant and during the pendency of Letters Patent Appeal, the Division Bench

ordered that the appellant be permitted to attend the classes. This Court, at the time

of issuance of notice, on 9th July, 2007, permitted the appellant to appear in the first

year M.B.B.S. examination, which was scheduled to commence on 10th July, 2007, but

directed that his result should not be declared.

It has been stated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant that, pursuant to the aforesaid order, the appellant appeared in the first

year M.B.B.S. examination and is prosecuting his further studies. He further stated

that one vacancy in first year of the M.B.B.S. course has become available because

one student left the course. This has not been denied by the counsel for the

respondents. In view of this and in the facts and circumstances of the case, we feel

that it would be just and expedient to direct Respondent No.2 to regularise the

appellant’s admission in N.R.I. quota. The result of the appellant, as regards first

year M.B.B.S. examination, be published and he shall be permitted to prosecute his

further studies, provided he has passed the examination.

The civil appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, July 28, 2008.