LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

NANI vs B UMANANDA NAIK on 28 July, 2008

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-004744-004744 - 2008Official PDFBench Satyabrata Sinha, Cyriac JosephAdvocates RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL | MALINI PODUVAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4744 OF 2008
[Arising out of SLP(C) No.1382/2007]
NANI AND ANR. ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
B. UMANANDA NAIK AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that

as no substantial question of law, as is required in terms of sub-section (4) of Section

100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been framed by the High Court, the impugned

judgment cannot be sustained. It is set aside accordingly and the matter is remitted to

the High Court for consideration thereof afresh.

All the contentions of the parties shall remain open.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

(S.B. SINHA)