LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

STATE OF PUNJAB vs SANTOSH KUMAR on 15 September, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-005656-005656 - 2008Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates KULDIP SINGH | RACHANA SRIVASTAVA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5656 OF 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.15866 of 2007)
State of Punjab & Ors. ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Santosh Kumar ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, having recorded a finding that it

had no territorial jurisdiction, was not justified in making any observation in relation

to the merit of the matter. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the writ

petition filed by the respondent before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana is

dismissed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.

We may, however, observe that this order shall not preclude the

respondent from moving the appropriate High Court for redressal of his grievances.

The civil appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, September 15, 2008.