LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

DIGAMBAR vs TRIMBAK on 13 October, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-006086-006086 - 2008Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU | NARESH KUMAR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6086 OF 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.8039/2007)
Digambar ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Trimbak ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Though the case was placed under the heading “Incomplete After Notice

Matters” but learned counsel for the parties agreed that argument be heard in the

matter.

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

By the impugned order, High Court allowed the second appeal pending

before it without formulating substantial question of law which is mandatory in case

any substantial question of law arises in such an appeal. As no such question of law

has been framed, impugned order is fit to be set aside on this ground alone.

Accordingly, civil appeal is allowed, impugned order rendered by the High

Court is set aside and the second appeal is remitted to the High Court to be disposed

of afresh after formulating substantial question of law, if any.

[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, October 13, 2008.