LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

KOKKU SUDHAKAR vs STATE OF A.P. REP.BY ITS PUB.PROSE.H.CT on 14 October, 2008

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001665-001665 - 2005Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Aftab Alam, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates D. BHARATHI REDDY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1665 OF 2005
Kokku Sudhakar ...Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The sole appellant was convicted by the Trial court under Section 302 of

the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short, “I.P.C.”] and sentenced to undergo

imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rupees ten thousand; in default, to undergo

further simple imprisonment for a period of one year. He was further convicted

under Section 309 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period

of one year. The sentences were, however, ordered to run concurrently. On appeal

being preferred, High Court confirmed the convictions. Hence, this appeal by special

leave.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the

records, we are of the view that the Trial Court as well as the High Court convicted

the appellant upon threadbare discussion of evidence and no interference by this

Court is called for.

The criminal appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

[AFTAB ALAM] New Delhi, October 14, 2008.