LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

RAMESH vs STATE OF M.P on 3 November, 2008

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001725-001725 - 2008Official PDFBench Chunilal Karsandas Thakker, Devinder Kumar Jain, Tirath Singh ThakurAdvocates JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA | C. D. SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1725 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3874 of 2007)
RAMESHAPPELLANT
vs.
STATE OF M.P. & ORS.RESPONDENTS
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1726&1728 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 4152&4072 of 2007)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Learned counsel for the parties stated that the matters have been

compromised between the parties and the compromise deed is placed on record.

The case related to an incident of 1998 but the conviction was under

Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Under Sec. 320 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure 1973, an offence punishable under Sec. 307 is not

compoundable.

In the light of the statutory provisions we are of the view that though no

compounding of offence can be allowed, on the facts and in the circumstances of

the case and in the light of the compromise deed, in our opinion, ends of justice

would be met if the conviction is maintained but sentence already undergone by the

accused is treated as adequate and sufficient.

The Criminal Appeals are disposed of accordingly.

(D.K. JAIN) New Delhi, November 3, 2008.