LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

LALU SAKHARAM RATHOD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 6 November, 2008

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000697-000697 - 2000Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Aftab Alam, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates C. G. SOLSHE | RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.697 OF 2000
Lalu Sakharam Rathod ...Appellant(s)
Versus
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Trial Court convicted the appellant under Section 7 read with Section 13

(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”]

and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and

to pay fine of Rupees five hundred; in default, to undergo further rigorous

imprisonment for a period of two months. He was further convicted under Section 13

(2) of the Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one

year and to pay fine of Rupees one thousand; in default, to undergo further rigorous

imprisonment for a period three months. Both the sentences, however, were ordered

to run concurrently. On appeal being preferred, High Court confirmed the

convictions. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

...2/-

Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and

perused the records, we are of the view that the Trial Court as well as the High Court

have recorded convictions of the appellant upon threadbare discussion of evidence

and no interference by this Court is called for.

The appeal, accordingly, fails and the same is dismissed.

Bail bonds of the appellant, who is on bail, are cancelled and he is directed

to be taken into custody forthwith to serve out the remaining period of sentence for

which the matter shall be reported to this Court by the Trial Court within two

months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

New Delhi, November 06, 2008.