LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

MADIVALYYA MATHAPATI vs SHIVANANDA BHOOSHETTI on 14 November, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-006655-006655 - 2008Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL | T. V. RATNAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6655 OF 2008
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.24401 of 2007)
Madivalyya Mathapati ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Shivananda Bhooshetti ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Trial Court decreed the suit against which order when an appeal was

filed, the appellate court dismissed the petition for condonation of delay of four

months and twenty seven days in filing the same and consequently dismissed the

appeal as barred by limitation. The said order has been confirmed by the High

Court. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and

perused the records, especially the grounds taken for condonation of delay, we are of

the view that the first appellate court was not justified in refusing to condone the

delay and dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation and the High court has

committed an error in confirming the same.

...2/-

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, impugned orders passed by the first

appellate court and the High Court are set aside, delay in filing the appeal before the

first appellate court is condoned and that court is directed to dispose of the appeal on

merits in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.

[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, November 14, 2008.