LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

PARAMJIT KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS on 28 November, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Official PDFBench Konakuppakatil Gopinathan Balakrishnan, Palanisamy Sathasivam, Jagdish Madhurlal Panchal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.6357 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION (CRL.)NO.497/1995
PARAMJIT KAUR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. The petitioner's husband – Shri Kikar Singh was one of the witnesses

in a criminal case pending before the Sessions Judge, Patiala. This petition

had been filed by his wife- the petitioner herein alleging that the witness

Kikar Singh was under threat and he should be given protection. This Court

had earlier directed the authorities to give protection and we are told that

the trial of the case is already over and that the witness no longer need any

protection. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there

are other criminal cases pending in which the said witness also involved and

so the protection should be extended further. We do not find any reason to

extend the protection. If there are any such cases, the petitioner would be

at liberty to approach the

appropriate authorities. Without prejudice to such right, the Crl.M.P. is

disposed of.