LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

SATISH OMPRAKASH GUPTA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 4 December, 2008

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000375-000375 - 2002Official PDFBench Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam SharmaAdvocates G. K. BANSAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 375 OF 2002
SATISH OMPRAKASH GUPTA & ORS.APPELLANTS
vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRARESPONDENT
O R D E R

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the

conviction so far as Omprakash Banarasdas Gupta and Kaushalya Omprakash

Banarasdas Gupta - Appellant Nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, cannot be maintained in

view of the unsatisfactory nature of the evidence. So far as appellant No.1-Satish

Omprakash Gupta is concerned, we find that the courts below have analyzed the

evidence correctly to find him guilty. However, the sentence is reduced to six months

on each count.

The appeal is allowed to aforesaid extent.

The bail bonds for the purpose of grant of bail, so far as appellant Nos.2 and

3 are concerned, shall stand discharged. The appellant No.-1 shall surrender to

custody forthwith for undergoing the remaining period of sentence.