LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

GURPREET ROHIT VERMA vs ROHIT VEDPAL VERMA on 12 January, 2009

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
T.P.(C) No.-000823-000823 - 2004Official PDFAdvocates R. D. UPADHYAY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 823 OF 2004
GURPREET ROHIT VERMA ... PETITIONER(S)
:VERSUS:
ROHIT VEDPAL VERMA ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

The parties hereto have arrived at a settlement. A Memorandum of

Settlement has been filed by the parties which is taken on record and accepted.

An application for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent has also been

filed by the parties. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the parties, we in

exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India direct that a

decree for dissolution of marriage, by mutual consent, in terms of Section 13B of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is passed. Let a formal decree be drawn by the Family

Court at Bandra, Mumbai.

Mr. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent states that in terms of

paragraph 7 of the settlement, all the requisite documents, including a demand draft

for Rs.3,00,000/- drawn in favour of the petitioner and two original letters in the

handwriting of the petitioner, have been handed over to Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,

learned counsel for the petitioner, the receipt whereof is admitted and acknowledged.

The transfer petition is disposed of accordingly.

(S.B. SINHA)