LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

DEO KUMAR SINGH vs C.B.P. SINHA on 19 January, 2009

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-000317-000317 - 2009Official PDFBench Biswanath Agrawal, Ganpat Singh SinghviAdvocates NAVIN PRAKASH | T. MAHIPAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.317 OF 2009
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.13260 of 2008)
Deo Kumar Singh ...Appellant(s)
Versus
C.B.P. Sinha ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

By the impugned order, Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal

Commission [for short, ‘the State Commission’] dismissed the complaint filed by the

appellant in which he claimed compensation of Rupees ten lakhs by alleging that on

account of negligence of the respondent wrong blood group came to be mentioned in

the report of the laboratory and, as a result of that, his wife had to suffer two

abortions. When the matter was taken in appeal, the National Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission [for short, ‘the National Commission’], held that there was

total failure on the part of the respondent in exercising adequate care in analyzing the

blood which made his wife to go for abortions. Accordingly the National Commission

awarded compensation of Rupees twenty five thousand together with interest @ 9%

per annum. Feeling dissatisfied, the appellant has filed this appeal.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, we

are convinced that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the National

Commission was not justified in awarding meagre compensation of Rupees twenty

five thousand. When the National Commission found that the respondent was guilty

of negligence in analyzing the blood and the wrong report given by him made the

appellant’s wife to suffer two abortions, higher compensation should have been

awarded to him. In our view, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the ends of

justice will be met if the appellant is awarded compensation of Rupees one lakh with

interest.

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in-part, the impugned order is modified

and the respondent is directed to pay a sum of Rupees one lakh by way of

compensation together with interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum form the

date of passing of the order by the National Commission, i.e., 11th December, 2007, till

payment is made. The respondent is directed to pay the entire amount to the

appellant within a period of four months from today.

[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, January 19, 2009.