Leave granted.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By the impugned order, the High Court has, during the pendency of the
Writ Petition filed by the landlord-respondent No.1 against the judgment of
Additional District Judge, Saharanpur who set aside the eviction order passed by
prescribed authority, directed the tenant-petitioner to pay rent at the rate of Rs.
2100/- per month in respect of the tenanted premises. The effect of this order is that
the petitioner, who was paying Rs. 150/- per month will have to pay Rs. 2100/- per
month.
At the hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent
stated that the impugned order may be set aside and the High Court may be directed
to dispose of the writ petition. We are also of the view that, in the facts and
circumstances of the present case, the High Court should not have ordered payment
of rent at the rate of Rs. 2100/- per month in place of Rs. 150/- per month.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.
The High Court shall now dispose of the writ petition in accordance with law.
[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, January 19, 2009.