LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

ROHITASH PRASAD vs SAIFUDDIN on 25 February, 2009

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-005115-005115 - 2007Official PDFBench Raju Varadarajulu Raveendran, Markandey KatjuAdvocates P. V. YOGESWARAN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5115 OF 2007
Rohitash Prasad & Ors. ……. Appellant(s)
Vs.
Saifuddin & Anr. ….… Respondent(s)
O R D E R

The appeal arises out of an application filed by the

appellants under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996, (‘Act’ for short). The Additional

District Judge No.2, Udaipur, as designate of the Chief

Justice of the High Court of Rajasthan, heard the said

application and dismissed it on 16.2.2001. The said order

was challenged by the appellants in a writ petition (SBCWP

No.3959/2001). The said writ petition was dismissed by the

High Court of Rajasthan on the ground that the remedy of

the appellant was only by way of an appeal under

Article 136 of the Constitution. The said order is

challenged in this appeal by special leave.

2. The matter is covered by the decision of this Court in

Punjab Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. vs. Kewal Singh

Dhillon – 2008 AIR SCW 5745. Following the said decision,

this appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court is

set aside. Consequently, the writ petition (SBCWP

No.3959/2001) stands restored on the file of the High Court

for disposal in accordance with law. As the matter is old,

the High Court is requested to dispose of the writ petition

expeditiously.

[R. V. Raveendran]

[Markandey Katju] New Delhi; February 25, 2009.