LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

SALIL CHATURVEDI vs UNION OF INDIA on 4 March, 2009

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
W.P.(C) No.-000576-000576 - 2004Official PDFAdvocates ANIL KATIYAR
SALIL CHATURVEDI
v.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
(W. P. (C) No. 576 of 2004)
MARCH 4, 2009
[K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, CJI, P.SATHASIVAM AND J. M. PANCHAL, JJ.]
[2009] 16 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 505
The Order of the Court was delivered
ORDER

W.P.(C) NO.576/2004

The Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights

and Full Participation) Act, 1995, (Act No.1 of 1996) passed by the Parliament

and it came into force with effect from 7.2.1996. The petitioner under Public

Interest Litigation filed this petition alleging that despite the commencement of

this Act No.1 of 1996, many of the State Governments or the local authorities

in the various States have not fully implemented Section 43 of the Act.

Section 43 of the Act reads as follows:

“43. Schemes for preferential allotment of land for certain purposes.-

The appropriate Government and local authorities shall be notification

frame schemes in favour of persons with disabilities, for the preferential

allotment of land at concessional rates for -

(a) house;

(b) setting up business;

(c) setting up of special recreation centres;

(d) establishment of special schools;

(e) establishment of research centres;

(f) establishment of factories by entrepreneurs disabilities.”

This Court issued notice to the various State Governments and the State

Governments have filed counter affidavit and also indicated various steps taken by the respective Government to implement Section 43 of the Act.

Some of the States have candidly admitted that they have not implemented

Section 43 of the Act. For example, the State of Arunachal Pradesh stated

that this is not so far implemented in the State. Some of the State

Governments stated that Section 43 was partially implemented and for

allotment of land for certain purposes as indicated in Section 43, some

percentage of reservation made in favour of disabled persons. By the

statements of the State Governments, it appears that only marginal benefit

sare given as indicated in Section 43 of the Act. No State has come forward

with specific plea that schemes have been formulated either by the State or

by the local authorities and percentage of reservation has already been made

in favour of the disabled persons.

Under the above circumstances, we direct that whenever the State

Governments or local authorities allot land for various purposes indicated in

Section 43 of the Act and various items indicated in Section 43, preferential

treatment be given to the disabled persons and the land shall be given at

concessional rate. The percentage of reservation may be left to the discretion

of the State Governments/local authorities. However, total percentage of

disabled persons shall be taken into account while deciding the percentage.

The Act has also been provided for appointment of Chief Commissioner to

look after the complaints of person with disabilities. Section 62 enables the

Commissioner to look into complaints with respect to matters relating to

deprivation of rights of persons with disabilities.

We had already directed various State Governments to appoint Chief

Commissioner as well as Commissioner and if any person feel that the State

Governments/local authorities are not extending the benefits to the persons

who are entitled to get such benefits under Section 43 of the Act, he would be

at liberty to make complaint to the appropriate authorities as envisaged under

the provisions of the Act. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.