LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

BOMMINENI SANJEEVA REDDY vs THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER on 25 March, 2009

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-002850-002852 - 2001Official PDFAdvocates A. RAGHUNATH | T. V. GEORGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2850-2852 OF 2001
Bommineni Sanjeeva Reddy & Ors. ...Appellant(s)
Versus
The Land Acquisition Officer ...Respondent(s)
With Civil Appeal No.1714/2002 and Civil Appeal No.6959/2002
O R D E R

Civil Appeal No.6959 of 2002:

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order.

The civil appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Civil Appeal Nos.2850-2852 of 2001 and 1714 of 2002:

By notifications issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

[hereinafter referred to as “the Act”], the Government of Andhra Pradesh acquired

lands of the appellants in different villages of Warangal district for construction of

the canals of Sriramsagar Project. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded

compensation @ Rs.11,200/- per acre for dry lands and Rs.14,000/- per acre for wet

lands. On the applications filed by the appellants under Section 18 of the Act, the

reference court, after considering the evidence produced by the parties including the

award made in relation to similar acquisition, enhanced the compensation from

Rs.11,200/- to Rs. 22,500/- per acre for the dry lands and from Rs. 14,000/- to

Rs.25,000/- per acre for the wet lands.

...2/-

The Land Acquisition Officer challenged the orders of the reference court

in A.S. Nos. 594/1999 and 837/1999 respectively. The appellants herein filed cross-

objections for further enhancement of compensation. By the impugned order, the

High Court dismissed the appeals and cross-objections. Hence, these appeals by

special leave.

During the pendency of these appeals, the appellants filed I.A. Nos. 5-7 of

2008 for producing additional evidence in the form of judgments (marked as

Annexures-P1 to P6 and P8) rendered by the High Court in cases involving award of

compensation in lieu of acquisition of land for construction of different canals of

Sriramsagar Project, four orders passed by this Court in special leave petitions filed

against the judgments of the High Court and copy of G.O.Ms. No.56 dated 23.4.2002

issued by the State Government for payment of compensation of the land acquired for

construction by Sriramsagar Project - Flood Flow Canal.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

A perusal of the documents filed with IA Nos. 5-7/2008 shows that by

judgments (Annexure-P3 to P6) dated 18.7.2001, 5.10.2001, 7.11.2001, different

Division Benches of the High Court allowed the appeals filed by the landowners,

whose lands were acquired by notifications issued under Section 4 of the Act in 1987

and early 1988 and enhanced the compensation payable to them from Rs.22,500/- to

Rs.40,000/- per acre for dry lands and from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.42,000/- per acre for the

wet lands. Annexure P-13 is the copy of order dated 18.11.2005 passed by this Court

in Special Leave Petition © Nos. 21065-21071 of 2003 whereby this Court enhanced

the compensation payable to the landowners to Rs.40,000/- per acre for the dry lands

and Rs.42,000/- per acre for the wet lands.

Since, the lands of the appellants were acquired in the year 1985 whereas

the cases in which higher compensation was awarded (almost two times the

compensation awarded to the

...3/-

appellants), acquisitions were made in 1987 and early part of 1988, we feel that ends

of justice would be met if the compensation payable to the appellants is enhanced and

fixed @ Rs.35,000/- per acre for the dry lands and Rs.37,000/- per acre for the wet

lands.

Accordingly, the appeals are allowed in part. The compensation payable

to the appellants in lieu of acquisition of their land is enhanced in the manner

indicated above and the respondents are directed to pay enhanced compensation, i.e.,

@ Rs.35,000/- per acre for dry lands and Rs.37,000/- per acre for the wet lands to the

appellants, who shall also be entitled to consequential benefits under the Act.

New Delhi, March 25, 2009.