Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
This appeal is directed against a judgment passed by a Learned Single Judge of the High
Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No.362/89 by which the High Court has partly
allowed the appeal quantifying the relief claimed by the appellant in the following manner :-
“It is hereby declared that the plaintiff was not a surplus teacher as per G.R.
dated 14th March, 1975. The defendants will pay compensation equivalent to three
years salary to the plaintiff along with interest thereon at the rate of 6% p.a. from
the date of institution of suit till the date of payment of the amount. Calculation
shall be made on the basis of the last drawn salary of the plaintiff on the date of the
order declaring him as surplus teacher.”
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after looking into the records and the
judgment of the High Court as well as of the courts below, we are of the view that the relief granted
by the High Court should be suitably modified.
It is not in dispute that the appellant has already retired in the year 1991. Accordingly,
keeping this fact in mind, we modify the decree passed by the High Court to the extent that the
appellant shall be entitled to 50% of salary from the date of institution of the suit till the date of
payment. As directed by the High Court, calculation shall be made on the basis of last drawn salary
of the appellant on the date of order of declaring him as a surplus teacher.
With this modification, the appeal is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.