LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

SHAILENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY vs STATE OF U.P on 8 May, 2009

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000973-000973 - 2009Official PDFAdvocates ANUVRAT SHARMA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 973 OF 2009
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 6806/2008)
Shailendra Kumr Upadhyay .. Appellant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. .. Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against order dated 30th October, 2007 passed by the

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail

Application No. 20447 of 2007. By the impugned order, second application filed by

the appellant for grant of bail has been dismissed.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

The appellant is facing trial for offence punishable under Sections

420/419,467/408/218,409 I.P.C. He was arrested on 4th May, 2006. While rejecting

the bail application, taking note of the fact that the appellant was in jail for the last

one and half years, the High Court has directed the Trial Court to complete the trial

within a period of three months. As noted earlier, the said direction was issued by

the High Court as far back as on 30th October, 2007. Admittedly, the trial has not

yet been concluded. In

: 2 :

fact on a pointed query by us, learned counsel for the State is not in a position to

answer as to how many witnesses have already been examined and how many still

remain to be examined.

Having regard to all these facts, we are of the opinion, that it is a fit case

where the benefit of regular bail should be granted to the appellant till the completion

of the trial. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed; impugned order is set aside and it is

directed that the appellant shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond

in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sound sureties in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the trial Court.

[ D.K. JAIN ]