LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD vs SAHEB SINGH on 20 July, 2009

Cites 0 provisionsCites 1 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-004539-004539 - 2009Official PDFAdvocates B. K. SATIJA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4539 OF 2009
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19006 of 2007)
National Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Saheb Singh ...Respondent(s)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

In spite of service of notice, nobody has entered appearance on behalf of

the respondent to contest the prayer made in this appeal.

The respondent filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Forum, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh [for short, “the District Forum”] for award of compensation of Rs.2,27,730/- with interest @ 18% per annum in lieu of

damage caused to the truck which was insured with the appellant. The District Forum dismissed the complaint on the ground that licence of the driver of the truck

viz., Khel Singh was fake. On appeal, the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [for short, “the State Commission”] concurred with

the District Forum that the licence of the driver was fake but, it granted relief to the complainant by relying upon the judgement of this Court in National Insurance

Company Limited vs. Swaran Singh [2004 (3) S.C.C.297]. The order of the State Commission has been confirmed by the National Consumer

...2/-

Disputes Redressal Commission [for short “the National Commission]. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the judgment in Swaran Singh’s case (supra) has been clarified in National Insurance Company

Limited vs. Laxmi Narain Dhut [2007 (3) S.C.C.700] and in view of the latter decision, insured cannot claim compensation for damage to his vehicle or goods

where the licence of the driver is fake. He pointed out that the insured-respondent had claimed compensation for the damage caused to his own vehicle and not for

third party and as such the ratio of Laxmi Narain Dhut’s case is squarely applicable to the present case.

We have carefully gone through the record and are satisfied that the issue raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment in Laxmi Narain Dhut’s case

and on that ground the orders passed by the State Commission and National Commission are liable to be set aside.

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, impugned orders passed by the State Commission as well as by the National Commission are set aside and the order

rendered by the District Forum dismissing the complaint is restored.

[G.S. SINGHVI] New Delhi, July 20, 2009.