LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

BELLARY STEELS & ALLOYS LTD vs DEPUTY COMMNR., COMMERCIAL TAXES on 12 August, 2009

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-004303-004303 - 2006Official PDFAdvocates PRAVEEN KUMAR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4303 OF 2006
Bellary Steels & Alloys Ltd. ...Appellant(s)
Versus
Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes (Assessments) & ...Responden
Ors. t(s)
W I T H
CIVIL APPEALS NOS.4306, 4305, 4304, 4308, 4307,
5660 & 5291 OF 2006
O R D E R

Heard both sides at length.

Appellant(s) herein agree to withdraw the original Writ Petitions filed

by them in the Karnataka High Court, unconditionally. In view of such

withdrawal, the impugned judgment of the Division Bench as well as the

judgment of the learned Single Judge will not survive. It is made clear that such

withdrawal of the original Writ Petitions will not preclude the Trade from moving

the Government with a proper representation explaining the fall-out of the

impugned Notification dated 11th October, 1995 and loss of benefit on account of

the impugned notification.

Today, when investments in the States is the need of the hour, the

Government needs to consider such representations of the Trade keeping in

mind the

CA 4303/06 etc..contd..

Industrial Policy, dated 12th July, 1993 as well as the Notification dated 28th

October, 1993 as also the subsequent Industrial Policy vide Government Order

dated 15th March, 1996 which, inter alia, contains an option to the assessee to opt

for the old versus new policy.

The representation, if any, will be made by the Trade within a period of

six weeks.

Before concluding, we may state that we have allowed the appellant(s)

to withdraw the original Writ Petition as the said proceedings came to be filed

against show cause notice. We have repeatedly held that in the absence of factual

foundation, it would be impossible to decide matters of this kind. When doctrine

of promissory estoppel is invoked, the doctrine needs to be based on factual data

which has not been pleaded. The High Court should not have interfered in the

matter. In these cases, the writ petition was filed without reply to even the show

cause notice. In the circumstances, we could have dismissed these Civil Appeals

only on the ground of failure to exhaust statutory remedy, but for the fact that

huge investments involving the large number of industries is in issue.

Subject to above, Civil Appeals are dismissed as

...3/-

CA 4303/06 etc..contd..

withdrawn with no order as to costs.

(AFTAB ALAM) New Delhi, August 12, 2009.