LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

PRAMOD KAMBLE vs SARITA on 17 August, 2009

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001562-001562 - 2009Official PDFBench Harjit Singh Bedi, Balbir Singh ChauhanAdvocates RAJIV MEHTA | SHIVAJI M. JADHAV
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1562 OF 2009
[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CRL.) NO. 3487 OF 2006]
PRAMOD KABLEAPPELLANT
VERSUS
SARITA AND OTHERSRESPONDENTS
O R D E R

Leave granted.

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

It is conceded at Bar that the respondents are being paid

Rs. 900/- per month as a consequence of the order of the

Matrimonial Court. A sum of Rs. 1500/- per month has also

been awarded by way of maintenance and a further sum of Rs.

1000/- each to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 by the learned

Magistrate, First Class, Akola and affirmed by the High

Court in proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, which would amount to Rs. 2,400/- to be

paid to the respondents by way of maintenance. This was

over and above Rs. 900/- that the appellant herein was

already directed to pay in the collateral proceedings for

divorce.

We have also gone through the grounds of revision

filed by the appellant herein before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola, in which he stated that he

was receiving Rs. 2,600/- per month after standard

deductions. This figure has not been challenged by the

wife.

In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion

that the award of Rs. 2,400/- out of Rs. 2,600/- is rather

excessive. We, accordingly, direct that the respondents

will get a total of Rs. 1,500/- as maintenance i.e. in

addition to Rs. 900/- as per the order of the Matrimonial

Court, a further sum of Rs. 200/- per month per person be

paid as maintenance under the present proceedings.

The appeal is allowed to the above extent.