LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

PHULIA vs KOUSHAL PRASAD on 24 August, 2009

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-005824-005824 - 2009Official PDFAdvocates BALRAJ DEWAN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5824 OF 2009
[Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22899/2008]
PHULIA AND ORS. ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
KOUSHAL PRASAD AND ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

We have heard the learned counsel for the

parties.

Leave granted.

In this matter the High Court has dismissed the

second appeal on the ground that it was filed after 53

days of limitation period. The High Court in its order

has mentioned that the appellants are very poor and are

not conversant with the legal intricacies of the

matter. But this fact did not weigh with the High

Court and it did not condone the delay of 53 days and

dismissed the second appeal.

In the facts and circumstances of this case, we

deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 53 days in

filing the second appeal. Accordingly, the impugned

order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the

High Court to decide the Second Appeal No.730/2006 afresh on merits.

As the matter is pending since 2006, we request

the High Court to decide the second appeal as

expeditiously as possible.

The appeal is disposed of with the

aforementioned observation and direction.