LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

UNION OF INDIA vs SHEOJI PRASAD GUPTA on 27 August, 2009

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001682-001682 - 2009Official PDFAdvocates SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL | RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1682 OF 2009
[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 9481/2008]
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
SHEOJI PRASAD GUPTA ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Respondent appeared in-person. To assist this

Court, we requested Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Senior Advocate

to appear in this case as amicus curiae.

We have heard the learned Additional Solicitor

General and Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned amicus in this

matter.

In our considered view, the High Court was not

justified in exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction

under Article 226 of the Constitution in the facts and

circumstances of this case. Consequently, the impugned

judgment of the High Court is set aside.

The learned Additional Solicitor General and Mr.

Vijay Hansaria, learned amicus submit that in the facts

and circumstances of this case, the proper course would

be that an opportunity be given to the respondent Sheoji

Prasad Gupta to file an appeal against the order dated

9.5.2008 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs &

Central Excise, Patna.

Accordingly, we allow the respondent Sheoji Prasad

Gupta to file an appeal before the Customs, Excise &

Service Tax Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata, against the

order dated 9.5.2008 passed by the Commissioner

(Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Patna, within six

weeks from the date of this order.

If such an appeal is filed by the respondent

within six weeks, the Tribunal is requested to decide the

appeal on its merit. Delay in filing appeal, if any, be

condoned. Considering the facts and circumstances of this

case, the Tribunal shall not insist on pre-deposit for

hearing of the appeal.

Since the matter has been pending for quite some

time, we request the Tribunal at Kolkata to decide the

matter within two months from the date of filing of the

appeal.

The appeal is disposed of with the aforementioned

directions and observation.

We place on record our appreciation for the able

assistance rendered by Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned

senior counsel appearing as an amicus curiae in this

case at our request.