LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

MANOJ SINGH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 28 August, 2009

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001658-001658 - 2009Official PDFAdvocates ABHIJIT SENGUPTA | RANA RANJIT SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1658 OF 2009
[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 6787/2007]
MANOJ SINGH ... APPELLANT(S)
:VERSUS:
STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

We have heard the learned counsel for the

parties.

Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against the order dated

26.2.2007 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at

Ranchi in Criminal Revision No. 878/2004. Brief facts

which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal are

recapitulated hereunder.

The appellant herein filed an application under

Section 217 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for

recalling of PWs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 for cross-

examination on the ground that charge in this case was

altered on 13.9.2004. As admittedly the charge has been

altered and an application under Section 217 Cr.P.C.

has been filed, in the interest of justice, we are of

the opinion that the appellant should be granted an

opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses after recalling the same. Learned counsel for the appellant

submits that it may not be necessary to cross-examine

Dr. Ajit Kumar Chaudhary (PW-2).

We accordingly direct PW-1 Prinka Kumar, PW-3

Yadunandan Singh, PW-6 Anil Kumar Singh, PW-7 Rajendra

Tripathi and PW-8 Faizal Ahmad shall appear before the

Trial Court on 14th September, 2009. Learned Trial

Court would try the examine the above-mentioned

witnesses on 14th September, 2009 and if it is not

possible on that date, then the case may be taken up on

15th and 16th September, 2009 for cross-examination.

The cross-examination shall, however, be

confined to the alteration of the charge.

The Trial Court shall stick to the time schedule

and would not entertain any unnecessary and

unreasonable request for adjournment either on behalf

of the prosecution or on behalf of the accused persons.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.