LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

M/S RAINBOW RUBBER INDUSTRIES vs ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CEN.EXCISE,MADUR on 1 October, 2009

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001849-001849 - 2009Official PDFAdvocates ROMY CHACKO | ANIL KATIYAR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1849 OF 2009
(@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.)No.3129 of 2008)
M/S RAINBOW RUBBER INDUSTRIES & ORS. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CEN.EXCISE,MADURAI RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R

Leave granted.

Appellant nos.2 and 3 herein, who are partners in the

appellant no.1 firm, are challenging the conviction and sentence

passed against them under Section 9 of the Central Excise & Salt

Act, 1944. It was alleged that the appellants evaded central excise

duty and the trial court found the appellants guilty and sentenced

them to undergo imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a

fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default to undergo simple

imprisonment for a period of one month each. The appellants

challenged their conviction before the Additional District and

Sessions Court and the same was dismissed. The appellants filed a

revision against the same before the High Court and the High Court

dismissed the revision and upheld the order of the District &

Sessions Judge.

Heard both sides.

Learned counsel for the appellants, submits that the

appellants are above 70 years' in age and the entire duty allegedly

evaded by the present appellants has already been paid by them.

Under the above circumstances and in view of the special reasons, we confirm the conviction but modify the sentence and direct that the

appellants 2 and 3 shall pay a sum of Rs.2 lacs each in lieu of six

months imprisonment within six weeks before the Addl.Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Madurai and produce a receipt before the authority

before whom the appellants had executed bail bonds and on production

of such receipt, their bail bonds will stand cancelled.

Appeal is disposed of accordingly.