1. This appeal is against the concurrent finding of the
trial court as well as the High Court whereby respondent
No. 2, the husband has been acquitted for the offences
under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code for
having caused the dowry death of his wife about two years
after the marriage. Both the courts have noted that a
suicide note had been written by the deceased shortly
before her death in which she had observed that nobody was
responsible for her death either from the side of her in-
laws or from the side of her parents and she was
committing suicide as she had lost interest in life and
that nobody should be held responsible for her death. The
courts below have also noted that the attempt of the
appellant herein Jaggu Singh, the father of the deceased, Crl. App. No. 1168 of 2003
to bring in evidence in Court with regard to the cruelty
meted out to his late daughter could not be believed for
the simple reason that he had made no such statement under
Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We are,
therefore, of the opinion that in the light of the
concurrent findings of fact recorded by the trial court as
well as by the High Court, no interference is called for
in this appeal.
2. For the reasons aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed.