age. She was therefore not that young a child who was incapable of understanding the implication of an oath and the sanctity of evidence. She has clearly stated as to the manner in which the incident happened and also as to the manner in which the injuries had been caused by the appellant. Farida’s statement is also corroborated by the statement of Maqbool Ahmed - P.W. 2 who had been attracted to the place on the shouts of the victim and had met Farida outside the house and had seen the appellant running way and had also attempted to apprehend him. The corroboration therefore the learned counsel for the appellant seeks can be found from the statement of Maqbool. The second argument is equally without merit. The nature of injuries particularly injury Nos,. 13 to 18 show the viciousness of the attack and the brutal manner in which the deceased had been cut up by the appellant. It is true that there was no animosity between the appellant and the deceased, but it appears that the appellant was doing a bit of moral policing and compelling her to wear a burqa and on her refusal to do so had got infuriated and picked up a knife and caused 13 injuries with it. We thus find no merit in the appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed.
[HARJIT SINGH BEDI] [C.K. PRASAD]
NEW DELHI AUGUST 04, 2010.