REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3286 OF 2007
CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR RESEARCH IN HOMEOPATHY Appellant (s)
VERSUS
BIPIN CHANDRA LAKHERA & ORS. Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
respondent No. 1. As regards the other respondents in
respect of whom service is complete no one has entered
appearance on their behalf so far.
This Appeal has been filed against the impugned
judgment & order dated 24.03.2004 passed by the High Court
of Sikkim in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 542 of 1998.
The facts have been given in the impugned judgment
and order and hence we are not repeating the same here,
except where necessary.
The short question in this Appeal is whether ad
hoc service of respondent No. 1 from 1984 before his
........................
J.
(MARKANDEY KATJU)
NEW DELHI; ........................J.
APRIL 20, 2011 (GYAN SUDHA MISRA)
:4: