4. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant submits that these matters are
squarely covered by the judgment of this Court
delivered in Union of India and Ors. vs. Krishan Lal
Arneja and Ors. (2004) 8 SCC 453. Learned counsel
appearing for the respondents does not dispute the
said submission.
5. As a matter of fact, the Notification
No.F.7(9)/86-L&B dated 6.3.1987 which is the subject
matter in these appeals, has been reproduced in
paragraph 7 of the aforementioned judgment wherein
8-A, Kamla Nagar, Delhi, which is the property in
question in the present case, is mentioned at Sl.
No.2.
6. Since the notification dated 6.3.1987 has
been quashed by this Court, the impugned judgments
of the High Court are set aside. These appeals are
allowed in terms of the said judgment, leaving the
parties to bear their own costs.
New Delhi; March 28, 2012.