LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

SHAH HEMANTKUMAR BHIKHALAL vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 18 January, 2013

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000136-000136 - 2013Official PDFBench Handyala Lakshminarayanaswamy Dattu, Ranjan GogoiAdvocates SURYA KANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2013
(SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.)NO.8844 OF 2012)
SHAH HEMANTKUMAR BHIKHALAL APPELLANT
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT RESPONDENT
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. Vide order dated 9th November, 2012, while issuing notice
and granting interim bail to the petitioner, this Court has ordered
that :
“We direct that, in the event of arrest, the
petitioner shall be granted interim bail subject to his
furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of
the Arresting/Investigating Officer, till the disposal of
the present Special Leave Petition. However, he shall
join investigation as and when called and shall abide by
the provisions stipulated under Section 438 (2)of the
Cr.P.C.”
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and having gone
through the records of the case, we are of the opinion that the
aforesaid order be madeJUDGMENTabsolute and is made absolute.
Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Ordered accordingly.
.......................J.
(H.L. DATTU)
.......................J.
(RANJAN GOGOI)
NEW DELHI;
JANUARY 18, 2013
JUDGMENT