LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs NATHI SINGH on 29 January, 2013

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000644-000644 - 2008Official PDFBench Handyala Lakshminarayanaswamy Dattu, Ranjan GogoiAdvocates PRAGATI NEEKHRA | HARBANS LAL BAJAJ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.644 OF 2008
STATE OF RAJASTHANAPPELLANT
VERSUS
NATHI SINGHRESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.645/2008
NATHI SINGHAPPELLANT
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHANRESPONDENT
1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order in D.B.
Criminal Appeal No.119JUDGMENTof 2004 of the High Court of Rajasthan at
Jaipur, dated 24.11.2005, whereby and whereunder the High Court
has allowed the appeal of the respondent-Nathi Singh.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. We have carefully perused the records and analysed the
evidence on record and in our considered view, the High Court and
the trial court have not committed any error which would call for
our interference. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
1. Mr. Abhishek, learned counsel appearing for the appellant
would inform us, that, since the accused did not get bail from
this Court, he must have served out the sentence that was imposed
by the Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court for the
offences punishable under Sections 365 and 384 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (“the IPC” for short).
2. In view of the above, in our opinion, nothing survives in
this appeal for our consideration and decision. Therefore, the
appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous.
.......................J.
(H.L. DATTU)
JUDGMENT

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 644 OF 2008

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Appellant (s)

VERSUS

NATHI SINGH Respondent(s) (With office report )

WITH CRL.APPEAL NO. 645 of 2008 (With office report)

Date: 29/01/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing

today.

CORAM :

For Appellant(s)/ Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik, AAG Respondent-State Mr.Varun Punia, Adv.

for Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

Mr.Abhishek, Adv.

For Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin For Respondent(s)JUDGMENTMr. Harbans Lal Bajaj,Adv.(NP)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

Criminal Appeal No.644/2008 is dismissed and Criminal Appeal No.645/2008 is dismissed having become infructuous, in terms of the signed order.

(G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi)

Court Master Court Master

(signed order is placed on the file)