LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

RE:EXPLOI.OF CHILN.INJ ORPH.IN ST.OF T.N vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS on 16 December, 2013

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Official PDFBench Surinder Singh Nijjar, Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, Shiva Kirti Singh
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CRL.) No.102 of 2007
Re. Exploitation of Children in
Orphanages in the State of Tamil Nadu
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union of India & Ors. …
Respondent(s)
O R D E R

3. Given the lackadaisical manner in which the States

and the Union Territories have responded to the

concern shown by this Court in relation to the wholly

unacceptable situation prevailing and to stamp out any

further exploitation of children, it has become

necessary to re-emphasize that it is the bounden duty

of the States under Articles 21, 21A, 23, 24, 45 and 51A

(k) to create and maintain a protective and healthy

environment in which children who are the future of

this country can bloom and subsequently become

mature and responsible citizen of this country. We have

been pained to notice the utterly callous attitude

adopted by the States as well as the Union Territories.

We, therefore, have no option at this stage but to issue

some further mandatory directions to ensure that the

exploitation of the children in all spheres of life is

brought to an end with utmost expedition.

4. We may notice at this stage that pursuant to our

earlier directions Tripura, Dadar and Nagar Haveli, JUDGMENT Lakshwadeep, Chandigarh, Andaman and Nicobar,

Pondicherry and Daman and Diu have still not

constituted State Commissions under Section 17 of the

Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005.

Some of the States which have established the State

Commissions for the protection of children but have not

completely constituted the same by either not

appointing a Chairperson or Members are as under:

Andhra Pradesh : The Commission exists only on

paper as no Chairman/Member has been appointed.

Chattisgarh is partially constituted as only

Chairman has been appointed and the members have

not been appointed.

Gujarat : Although Chairman has been appointed

yet no member or Secretary of the Commission has

been appointed.

Haryana : The situation is exactly the same as

Gujarat, i.e. neither any Member nor Secretary has

been appointed although the Chairman has been

selected and appointed. JUDGMENT

Himachal Pradesh: Only a Member Secretary has

been appointed. No Chairperson or Member has been

appointed.

Kerala - Again only a Secretary has been

appointed but there is no Chairperson or Member

appointed.

Tamil Nadu has appointed a Chairperson but no

Member has been appointed.

Nagaland – Nothing has been done, i.e. no

Chairperson or Member has been appointed.

Similarly in U.P., nothing has been done as neither

the Chairperson nor any Member has been appointed.

5. This inaction of the States is in the teeth of the

directions issued by this Court on 3rd January, 2013 and

7th February, 2013. We make it clear that this Court had

taken notice of the exploitation of children and the

deplorable conditions of children in various orphanages

on the basis of the letter received, way back in the year

2007. Surely, the States and the Union Territories must JUDGMENT realize that they have to operate under the Constitution

and have to be duty bound to act in accordance with

the provisions of the Constitution. Furthermore, each

and every field which concerns the welfare and the

protection of the children is covered by relevant

legislation. The three prominent Acts have already been

listed hereinabove.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid attitude of the

States and the Union Territories, we direct that the

Chief Secretaries of all the States to which notices have

been issued in this matter shall file an affidavit within a

period of eight weeks from the date of this order

disclosing full details with regard to the implementation

of the obligations specified under the three Acts. The

affidavit shall contain all the relevant information with

regard to the following :

a. Whether the State Commissions have been

set up under Section 17 of the JUDGMENT

Commissions for Protection of Child Rights

Act, 2005?

b. Whether the appointment of the

Chairperson and six Members has been

made indicating the names of such

Chairpersons and members?

c. Whether Rules have been framed by the

State Governments under the said Act?

d. Whether the said Commissions are

functional and if not what are the

constraints. The appointment and the

remuneration structure of the Chairperson,

Members and supports staff including

Member Secretary of the State

Commissions?

e. The Chief Secretaries of the States in their

affidavits to also indicate whether Special

Courts have been designated under

Section 28 of the Protection of Children

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012? JUDGMENT f. Whether Special Public Prosecutors have

been appointed under Section 32 of the

said Act?

g. Whether Rules have been framed under

the Right to Education Act, 2009?

h. Whether all Institutions run by the State

Governments or by Voluntary

Organisations for Children in need care and

protection have been registered under the

provisions of Section 34 of the Juvenile

Justice (Care and Protection of Children)

Act, 2000, read with Rule 71 of the said

Act?

i. Whether any unregistered institutions for

children in need of care and protection are

being run and if so have they been shut

down or taken over by the State

Governments? 7. It is further directed that in the unlikely event of

there being a non-compliance of any part of the

directions issued by this Court, an officer of the rank of

Principal Secretary of State Government shall remain

present in person in the Court to clarify the issues with

respect to the failure to implement the directions of the

Court. If for any reason, the affidavit, as directed for, is

not filed by the Chief Secretary before the next date of

hearing, then also, the officer of the rank referred

above shall remain present in person to explain the

reasons for the State’s failure to submit the affidavit.

8. The concerned State Governments shall also

submit the required information in the format annexed

hereto as part of the affidavit to be filed by them.

[Surinder Singh

Nijjar]

[Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim

Kalifulla]

New Delhi; December 16, 2013.

ANNEXURE

S.N Obligation of the States Current Detailed reasons for failure including Received date by

Status of which the o Implementa implementation would

tion (Carried stand carried out

out/not

date of

order

which

was

tion JUDGMENTimpossible implemen-tation ChieftowardsSecretary

mentaton

1.Constitution of Special Court (section 28)

2.Appointment of Special Public Prosecutor

3.Framing of Guidelines for use of NGOs, experts etc. to be associated with the pretrial & trial stage to assist the child (section 39)

4.Public Awareness about the Act & any Periodic Training imparted to the officers of the Govt. etc. (section 43) THE RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO FREE & COMPULSORY EDUCATION ACT, 2009 S.N Obligation of the Current Detailed reasons for failure including Received date by which States Status of the implementation would o Implementa stand carried out tion (Carried out/not date of order which was mentaton 1. Constitution of State Commissions for Protection of Child Rights (section 31 r/w Rule 27) 2. Appointment of State Advisory Council (section 34) 3. Rules made for carrying out the provisions of the Act (section 38) THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, 2000 S.N Obligation of Current Detailed reasons for failure including Received date by which the the States Status of implementation would stand o Impleme carried out ntation (Carried out/not JUDGMENT carried out) with details date of order which was mentaton of Juvenile Justice Board of Observation Homes of Special Homes – If any, details. of child JUDGMENT Welfare Committee of Children’s Homes

6.Appiontment of Inspection Committee – If any, details

7.Recognition of Shelter Homes – If any, details

8.Creation of Fund for the welfare of juveniles THE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS ACT, 2005 S.N Obligation of Current Detailed reasons for failure including Received date by which JUDGMENT the States Status of the implementation would o Implementati stand carried out on (Carried out/not as to the date of order which was mentaton of State for Protection of Child Rights 2. Appointment of Chairperson and other members 3. Appointment JUDGMENT of Secretary & other officers for carrying out the functions of the State (section 21(1) 4. Annual & Special Reports submitted by State to the State. If any, details (section 23(1)) of Children’s Court (section 25) 6. Appointment of Special Public Prosecutor 7. Grants by the State Government to the State Commission. If any, details JUDGMENT (section 28(1) 8. Rules made to carry out the provisions of the Act (Section 36(1).