12. Therefore, in our opinion, the decisions of
the Court based on different scales of Article 136
and Article 142 of the Constitution of India cannot
be best weighed on the same grounds of reasoning
and thus in view of the aforesaid discussion, there
is no conflict in the views expressed in the first
two judgments and the latter judgment.
13. In that view of the above, we are of the
considered opinion that reference was unnecessary.
Therefore, without answering the reference, we send
back the matters to the Division Bench for its
appropriate disposal.
Ordered accordingly.
(H.L. DATTU)
SLP(C) No.11684 of 2012 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 17.01.2011 in civil Writ Petition No. 16277 of 2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh )
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RAFIQ MASIH (WHITE WASHER) Respondent(s)
WITH
S.L.P. (C) No. 21554 of 2013 (With office report)]
(With c/delay in filing/refiling SLP and office report) JUDGMENT
S.L.P. No.....CC No. 16850 of 2011(With c/delay in JUDGMENTfiling/refiling SLP and office report)
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
(With c/delay in filing/refiling SLP and office report) JUDGMENT
(With c/delay in filing SLP and office report) JUDGMENT
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
(With c/delay in filing SLP/refiling)
(Permission to urge new facts and file additional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report)
S.L.P. (C) No 11702 of 2012
(With appln. for permission to bring additional facts and documents on record and office report)
S.L.P. No. 11703 of 2012(With office report)JUDGMENT
S.L.P. Nos. 6632-6633 of 2012
S.L.P. No.....CC No.6659 of 2012
S.L.P. No.....CC No. 6829 of 2012(With c/delay in JUDGMENTfiling SLP and office report)
S.L.P.(C) NO. 11072 of 2013
(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP and placing addl. facts and documents on record and office report)
S.L.P. No.....CC No.13044 of 2012
S.L.P. No.26307 ofJUDGMENT2012
SLP(C) NO. 28828/2012(With office report)JUDGMENT
SLP(C) NO. 28829/2012 ]
(With office report) JUDGMENT
SLP(C) NO. 10941/2013JUDGMENT) (C/DELAY IN FILING SLP AND OFFICE REPORT)\
(With appln. for C/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report)
Date : 08/07/2014 These petitions were called
on for hearing today.
CORAM :
For Petitioner(s) Mr. L.N. Rao, ASG
Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Addl Adv. Gen.
Mr. Jagdish Singh Chhabra, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Joginder Sukhija, Adv.
Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Pal, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Adv.
Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, Adv.
Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv.
Dr.(Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Dinesh Verma, Adv.
Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Adv.
Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, adv.
Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh K Verma, Adv.
Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv.
Mr. Balbir Singh gupta, Adv.
Ms. Namita choudhary, Adv.
Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale, Adv.
Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Adv.
Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv.
Mr. Sudhir Walia, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv.
Mr. Balbir Singh gupta, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Gupta, adv.
Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, Adv.
Mr. S.L. Aneja, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Without answering the reference, the JUDGMENT matters are sent back to the Division bench for
its appropriate disposal.
[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ]
Court Master Asstt. Registrar
[ Signed order is placed on the file ]