LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

HIND CHARITABLE TRUST SHEKHAR HOSPITAL PVT.LTD vs UNION OF INDIA on 18 September, 2014

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
ReportableW.P.(C) No.-000469-000469 - 2014Official PDFBench Anil Ramesh Dave, Vikramajit Sen, Uday Umesh LalitAdvocates LAWYER S KNIT & CO
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 469 OF 2014
HIND CHARITABLE TRUST SHEKHAR HOSPITAL
PVT. LTD. PETITIONER(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(s)
WITH
W.P.(C) No. 700/2014
W.P.(C) No. 705/2014
W.P.(C) No. 706/2014
W.P.(C) No. 707/2014
SLP(C) No. 21765/2014
SLP(C) No. 22755/2014
SLP(C) No. 22756/2014
SLP(C) No. 22757/2014
SLP(C) No. 22758-22759/2014
SLP(C) No. 22974/2014
W.P.(C) No. 784/2014
SLP(C) No. 23512/2014
SLP(C) No. 23777/2014
W.P.(C) No. 757/2014
W.P.(C) No. 799/2014
SLP(C) No. 22785/2014
SLP(C) No. 23476/2014
SLP(C) No. 23547/2014
SLP(C) No. 24150-24151/2014
SLP(C) No. 24154/2014
T.P.(C) No. 1217/2014 JUDGMENT SLP(C) No. 24665/2014
SLP(C) No. 24913/2014
W.P.(C) No. 819/2014
SLP(C) No. 24686/2014
SLP(C) No. 25763/2014
O R D E R

WITH SLP(C) No. 22758-22759/2014 SLP(C) No. 24150-24151/2014 T.P.(C) No. 1217/2014 JUDGMENT SLP(C) No. 24665/2014

O R D E R

Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for both

the sides.

Looking at the peculiar facts and circumstances of

the case and, especially, when several seats for medical

admission are likely to remain vacant for the academic

year 2014-15, we are of the view that these matters

require urgent consideration and we are giving these

interim directions under the provisions of Article 142 of

the Constitution of India.

There is one more reason for passing this interim

order. We are conscious of the fact that number of

physicians in our country is much less than what is

required and because of non-renewal of recognition of

several medical colleges, our citizens would be deprived

of a good number of physicians and therefore, we are

constrained to pass this order, whereby at least there

would be some increase in the number of physicians after

five years. We are running against time because the last

date for giving admissions to MBBS Course for the

academic year 2014-15 is 30th September, 2014.

We also desire to reconsider the directions given by this Court in the judgment of Priya Gupta v. State ofChhattisgarh [(2012) 7 SCC 433], but at this juncture, as

we do not have sufficient time to decide all these

petitions finally, we are passing this interim order and

the matter with regard to reconsideration of the

aforestated judgment would be considered while finally

disposing of this group of petitions.

It has been submitted on behalf of the learned

senior counsel appearing for all the petitioners/

respondents, who are managing medical colleges, that the

defects which had been recorded at the time of the last

inspection by the representatives of the Medical Council

of India have been duly rectified and at present, the

defects pointed out in the reports do not exist. The

said fact can be ascertained only by having a fresh

Compliance Verification/Inspection. However, the stand

taken by the Central Government and the Medical Council

of India is to the effect that no such inspection can be

undertaken in the present academic session because of

paucity of time and it would violate the time schedule

laid down by this Court in the case of Priya Gupta

(supra).

The learned senior counsel appearing for the

Medical Council of India has also submitted that the

petitioners do not have any legal right for getting

renewal of the recognition, especially in view of the fact that the Verification/Inspection Reports are notavailable for the period in question. The learned senior

counsel has relied upon some of the Judgments to

substantiate his case and according to him, it would not

be just and proper to permit the said medical colleges to

take fresh batch of students.

Looking at the peculiar facts of the case and the

circumstances stated hereinabove, we direct the

petitioners to file undertakings by President/Chairman

and Secretary of the petitioners' institutions running

medical colleges within 10 days from today, to the effect

that there is no defect in the medical colleges run by

them and they would also state that their deposit with

the MCI, which is around Rs.10 crores, be forfeited by

way of penalty if the statement made in the undertaking

is found to be incorrect at the time of the next

inspection. A draft undertaking has been given to this

Court. A copy of the undertaking, which might be filed

by the institutions, shall be served upon the office of

the Medical Council of India as well as to the Ministry

of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

We also record the fact that in the recent past,

the Medical Council of India has renewed recognition of

Government Medical Colleges on the basis of undertakings

and therefore, we see no reason not to permit the private colleges to admit students on the basis of undertakingsgiven by their office bearer as a special case.

Notwithstanding any direction given in the case of

Priya Gupta (supra), if undertakings as stated

hereinabove are filed by the institutions managing

medical colleges for the academic year 2014-15,

admissions shall be given to the students from the merit

list prepared by the States and they shall be charged

fees prescribed by the Government Medical Colleges of

their respective States. The State Authorities, i.e., the

Directorate of Medical Education & Research, of the

respective States shall send students, in order of their

merit, to the medical colleges run by the petitioners,

which are situated within their States, within one week

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the

said students shall be admitted to the MBBS Course in

accordance with the rules and regulations of the MCI and

also regulations dated 16.04.2010 framed by the Medical

Council of India, provided undertakings as mentioned

above are filed on behalf of the concerned institutions.

It is also clarified that there would be no further

counselling in respect of the students who are to be

given admission, even if it might result into some heart

burning among other students, but in the peculiar facts

of the case, we give this direction.

In no case, JUDGMENTthe admission shall be given after 30thSeptember, 2014. This order shall also apply to all the

institutions which had filed their petitions earlier for

renewal of their recognition for the academic year 2014-

15, but their petitions were rejected or withdrawn for

whatever reason, provided undertakings as stated

hereinabove are filed by President/Chairman and the

Secretary of those institutions. All those petitions

shall be deemed to have been revived and this order shall

be deemed to have been passed in those cases also. This

order shall only be in respect of renewal of recognition

and not for creation of additional seats or for new

colleges.

We also record that the Union of India has

supported the petitioners in the interest of students.

We also direct the Union of India to give wide publicity

to this order in print as well as electronic media in the

interest of the concerned students.

It is directed that the list of students getting

admission in pursuance of this order shall be placed on

record of this Court by 1st October, 2014 by the

concerned institutions and a copy thereof shall also be

sent to the MCI.

These matters shall be treated as part-heard and

shall be notified for further hearing in the month of

December, 2014.

New Delhi; September 18, 2014.