We have heard the learned senior counsel
appearing for the review petitioner and the
learned senior counsel appearing for the
respondent, at length. We have gone through
the judgment sought to be reviewed and we have
considered the arguments advanced on both
sides. As requested, we have also gone through
the judgment of the trial court, in order to
appreciate the contention on conviction and JUDGMENT
sentence. We find that all the arguments
advanced by the review petitioner have been
considered in detail in the judgment which is
sought to be reviewed. Hence, we do not find
any error apparent on the face of record or any
other ground so as to warrant interference in
exercise of our review jurisdiction.
The review petition is hence dismissed.
[KURIAN JOSEPH] New Delhi; 9th April, 2015.