LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

MUKHTAR KHAN vs STATE OF CHATTISGARH on 28 September, 2015

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001280-001280 - 2015Official PDFBench Kurian Joseph, Arun Kumar MishraAdvocates MUSHTAQ AHMAD
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1280 OF 2015
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 621 OF 2014]
MUKHTAR KHAN & ORS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF CHATTISGARH & ANR Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for both the

sides.

We find that during the pendency of the appeal

before this Court, the husband and the wife have

reached a settlement and the terms of settlement

dated 24.04.2015 shall form part of this order.

Since it is not in dispute that the terms of JUDGMENT settlement have been acted upon and that the wife has

received the amount in terms of the settlement, in

the interests of justice, we find that the criminal

proceedings between the parties are not to be

pursued. Therefore, the following proceedings are

quashed :-

A. Case No. 219 of 2014 filed by the respondent-wife

against the petitioner-husband under Section 125

Cr.P.C. pending before the Family Court, Raipur,

Chhatisgarh.

B. Case No. 1371 of 2013 filed under Domestic

Violence Act filed by the respondent-wife against the

petitioner-husband pending before the Magistrate

Court at Raipur, Chhatisgarh.

C. Appeal filed against the decree of divorce filed

by the respondent-wife pending before Family Court,

Hamirpur, Utter Pradesh.

D. FIR No. 53 of 2012 dated 04.10.2012, Police

Station Mahila Thana, Raipur and Case No. 188 of 2013

pending in the Raipur Court.

In view of the above directions and the

settlement arrived at between the parties, this

appeal is disposed of.

[ ARUN MISHRA ] New Delhi; JUDGMENT September 28, 2015.