LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

ALI HASAN @ MALLAH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 8 December, 2015

Cites 1 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-001655-001655 - 2015Official PDFBench Kurian Joseph, Adarsh Kumar GoelAdvocates NAFIS A. SIDDIQUI
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1655 OF 2015
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(s).9245/2013)
ALI HASAN @ MALLAH APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned

counsel appearing for the respondent-State.

The appellant is aggrieved by the conviction under Sections

376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short 'IPC') and JUDGMENT sentence of ten years and one year respectively with default

clause. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the present

case, We are of the considered view that hearing of the appeal be

limited to quantum of sentence. Neither the Trial Court nor the

High Court has given any indication for the award of ten years

under Section 376 IPC. Having regard to the facts of the case, we

are of view that ends of justice would be met by limiting the

sentence to the prescribed minimum. Therefore, the sentence under

Section 376 is modified to the prescribed minimum of seven years.

We make it clear that no other modification is made in the sentence

under Section 506 or in the default clause. However, the sentences

shall run concurrently.

The appeal is partly allowed as above.