LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

IRA BASU CHOWDHURY vs CALCUTTA METROPOLITAN DEV.AUTH on 20 January, 2016

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-002148-002148 - 2006Official PDFBench Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali NarimanAdvocates RAUF RAHIM | RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2148 OF 2006
IRA BASU CHOWDHURY & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
CALCUTTA METROPOLITAN DEV.AUTH. & ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T

The appellants are essentially aggrieved by the

interference made by the High Court on the land value

fixed by the Reference Court on the ground that the

Requisitioning Authority was not put to notice while

the Reference Court fixed the land value.

Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel

appearing for the appellants, has invited our

attention that in any case, the Requisitioning

Authority may not have any difficulty in accepting

the land value at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- per

cottah, since the said value has been accepted by the JUDGMENT first respondent in LRA Case No. 363/93(v) in respect

of the adjoining land.

In our opinion, this is certainly a matter for

the Reference Court to consider while disposing of

the case as per the direction issued by the High

Court in the impugned Judgment.

In order to avoid further delay, we direct the

parties to appear before the Reference Court on

15.02.2016.

In view of the above, this civil appeal is

disposed of with a direction to the Reference Court

to dispose of the reference in accordance with law

within a period of two months from the date mentioned

above.

There shall be no order as to costs.

New Delhi; January 20, 2016.