LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

DDA vs RAMA GHAI on 31 August, 2016

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-008600-008600 - 2016Official PDFBench Kurian Joseph, Chokkalingam NagappanAdvocates SAHARYA & CO.
NON REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.8600 OF 2016
(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.30744 of 2015)
D.D.A. Appellant(s)
Versus
RAMA GHAI AND OTHERS Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T

Leave granted.

The issue, in principle, is covered against the

appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) No. 8467 of 2015.

This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this

case, the appellant is given a period of one year to

exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.

We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition

proceedings are initiated within the said period of one

year from today by issuing a Notification under Section

11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall

return the physical possession of the land to the

original land owner.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

New Delhi, August 31, 2016