LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

LOKESH KATARA vs HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT on 14 December, 2016

Cites 2 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
ReportableW.P.(C) No.-000758-000758 - 2016Official PDFBench Tirath Singh Thakur, Lavu Nageswara Rao, Dhananjaya Yeshwant ChandrachudAdvocates LAWYER S KNIT & CO
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 758 OF 2016
LOKESH KATARA AND ANRPETITIONERS
Versus
HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARATRESPONDENT
O R D E R

These proceedings have been instituted under Article 32 of the

Constitution by two petitioners who are stated to be working as

Systems Officers and Systems Assistants since 2009 on a contractual

basis. The petitioners state that Systems Officers and Systems

Assistants were engaged in the High Court and the district courts in

the State of Gujarat in consonance with the National Policy and Action

Plan prepared by the E-Committee. In 2013, the Government of

Gujarat sanctioned posts of Systems Officers and Systems Assistants

in the regular cadre. An amendment was made to the recruitment

rules in 2015 for filling up these posts by direct recruitment. The

existing Systems Officers and Systems Assistants working in various

district courts submitted a representation seeking their absorption. An

online skill test was conducted. Another representation was submitted

on 16 March 2016. However, the representation for absorption was

rejected on 26 May 2016. On 9 September 2016 an advertisement

was published by the Registrar (Recruitment and Finance) inviting

applications for thirty posts of Systems Officers and thirty posts of

Systems Assistants. The Writ Petition has been instituted seeking to

challenge the advertisement issued by the High Court and for a mandamus for incorporating a provision in the recruitment rules for the

absorption of the petitioners and similarly placed persons.

2 We are not inclined to entertain a Writ Petition under Article 32 of

the Constitution. The petitioners have a remedy available of moving

the High Court on the judicial side under Article 226 of the

Constitution. In the circumstances, while leaving it open to the

petitioners to institute appropriate proceedings as they may be

advised, we decline to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the

Constitution.

3 The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.

New Delhi December 14,2016