LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

VARUN KUMAR GUPTA vs OM PRAKASH on 14 February, 2017

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
C.A. No.-003420-003421 - 2011Official PDFBench Kurian Joseph, Ajay Manikrao Khanwilkar, Kuttiyil Mathew JosephAdvocates RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL | P. NARASIMHAN
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3420-3421/2011
VARUN KUMAR GUPTA APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T

The appellant/landlord is aggrieved by the

impugned order dated 27.04.2010 in the matter of

eviction. Though several contentions are taken by

the parties, on a suggestion made by the Court, it is

heartening to note that the appellant/landlord has

graciously agreed to provide a reasonable time to the

respondent/tenant for surrendering vacant possession.

2.Having regard to the factual matrix of the case, we are of the view that overall justice would be served in case the respondent/tenant is given time to JUDGMENT vacate up to 31.12.2020.

3.Accordingly, these appeals are disposed of as follows: The respondent/tenant shall surrender vacant possession of the premises on or before 31.12.2020. He shall also file an undertaking to that effect in the Registry of this Court within three months from today. During the said period the respondent/tenant will continue to remit Rs.1102/- per month, all inclusive.

4.Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

5.There shall be no orders as to costs. [KURIAN JOSEPH] [A.M. KHANWILKAR] NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 14, 2017. JUDGMENT