LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

B.N. SRIVASTAVA vs CBI, EOU-IV, NEW DELHI on 25 April, 2017

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
Crl.A. No.-000784-000784 - 2017Official PDFBench Jasti Chelameswar, Syed Abdul NazeerAdvocates VEERA KAUL SINGH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURSIDCITON
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2017
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No.10161 of 2016)
B.N. SRIVASTAVA …APPELLANT
VERSUS
CBI, EOU-IV, NEW DELHI …RESPONDENT
O R D E R

The High Court by its order dated 11th November, 2016 has

dismissed the application filed by the appellant challenging the

aforesaid order.

4 We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5 It is clear that the appellant has already deposited a sum of

Rupees ten lakh in terms of an interim order passed by the High

Court. It is also clear from the materials on record that the

co-accused, namely, B.N. Yadav and R.K. Singh have been granted

bail without a condition being imposed upon them for depositing

the amount. The appellant has been in custody for more than four

years. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the

view that the Special Court was justified in granting the bail to the

appellant. However, the condition imposed by the court below for

depositing Rupees fifty lakh is onerous. The appellant has already

deposited Rupees ten lakh, which is sufficient for granting bail to

him. Therefore, direction issued by the trial court for deposit of

Rupees fifty lakh for grant of bail is accordingly modified.

6 The appellant shall be released on bail if he satisfies the other

conditions imposed by the Special Court in its order dated 28th

April, 2016. JUDGMENT

7 The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

New Delhi; (S. ABDUL NAZEER) April 25, 2017.