LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

SHAIK SHAHANAJ vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 November, 2017

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2017 INSC 1142C.A. No.-019766-019766 - 2017Official PDFAuthor Kurian JosephBench Kurian Joseph, Amitava Roy, Kuttiyil Mathew JosephAdvocates SUDARSHAN RAJAN
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 19766 OF 2017
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(S).19934/2017]
SHAIK SHAHANAJ PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T

1.KURIAN, J. In the nature of order we propose to pass in this matter it is not necessary to issue notice.

2.Leave granted.

3.The appellant is aggrieved by the rejection of the interim order passed by the State Administrative Tribunal, as confirmed by the High Court. The matter pertains to the selection for the post of Police Constable. The appellant was denied the appointment on the ground that he did not produce the non-creamy layer certificate at the required time.

4.We find that the original application filed by the appellant is pending before the Tribunal. The appellant has produced a copy of the non-creamy layer certificate before this Court.

5.The appellant is directed to produce the same before the Administrative Tribunal. We also direct the Tribunal, being a matter of selection and appointment, to dispose of the original application expeditiously and in any case within three months NARENDRA PRASAD

6.The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

7.We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

8.Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

9.There shall be no orders as to costs. [KURIAN JOSEPH] [AMITAVA ROY] NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER 24, 2017.