LawDistill
Supreme Court of India

HARVINDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HARYANA COLLECTOR on 23 April, 2018

Cites 0 provisionsCites 0 judgmentsCited by 0
2018 INSC 389C.A. No.-004282-004283 - 2018Official PDFAuthor Kurian JosephBench Kurian Joseph, Mohan Shantanagoudar, Kuttiyil Mathew JosephAdvocates SUDHIR NAAGAR
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4282-4283/2018
(ARISING FROM SLP (C) NOS.10840-10841 OF 2018
@ DIARY NO.22421/2017)
HARVINDER SINGH APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T

1.KURIAN, J. Delay condoned.

2.Leave granted.

3.In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents.

4.The appellant is aggrieved by the compensation awarded in the land acquisition referred to in RFA No.3192/2013 on the file of the Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.

5.We find that all the connected matters have been remitted to the High Court, as agreed by both the sides. We are informed that the matters are still pending before the High Court.

6.Therefore, we remit this matter also to the High Court. This matter shall also be considered afresh by the High Court along with the connected matters, which are now being considered by the High Court. NARENDRA PRASAD 8. The appellant is directed to serve a copy of this respondents.

9.Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

10.There shall be no orders as to costs. [KURIAN JOSEPH] [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR] NEW DELHI; APRIL 23, 2018.