ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS — Supreme Court of India, 14 May, 2018

ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 877/2018 @ SLP(C)NO.15852/2018

ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS Respondent(s)

Date : 14-05-2018 This appeal was mentioned today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Appellant(s) Mr. Amit Gupta,Adv.

Ms. Mansi Kukreja,Adv.

M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, AOR

Mr. Mohd. Waquas,Adv.

Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh,Adv.

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR

UPON being mentioned the Court made the following

O R D E R

On the matter being mentioned, the learned counsel for the parties stated that there may not be necessity of a direction as contained in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the judgment passed by this Court on 11.5.2018, which accordingly stand deleted.

They further plead that paragraph 27 of the said judgment may be read as under:

“The respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order.” Ordered accordingly.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.877 OF 2018

On the matter being mentioned, the learned counsel for the

parties stated that there may not be necessity of a direction as

contained in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the judgment passed by this

Court on 11.5.2018, which accordingly stand deleted.

They further plead that paragraph 27 of the said judgment may

be read as under:

“The respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory

benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within

a period of three months from the date of the order.” Ordered

accordingly.

ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS on 14 May, 2018